Αναζήτηση αυτού του ιστολογίου

14 Απριλίου, 2026

The Death of Seamanship in the Age of Compliance

 

Προβολή του προφίλ του χρήστη Michail Kvasnikov

Michail Kvasnikov

•3η+

Maritime Strategic Lead

5 ημ. •


The Death of Seamanship in the Age of Compliance


Can a vessel operate without a mountain of paperwork?

The technical answer is yes. Theoretically, a ship only needs a skilled crew and sound seamanship to navigate the globe.

But here is the hard truth: True seamanship is becoming a rare commodity.

In the modern maritime world, we’ve reached a point where nobody trusts the person; they only trust the paper. This explosion of documentation and "check-the-box" culture exists because the industry has lost faith in individual judgment.

When trust is missing, you get the bare minimum.

We have traded intuitive, high-level seamanship for rigid compliance. When we focus entirely on whether the documents are in order, we risk overlooking whether the ship is actually being handled with the soul and skill it requires.

Documentation shouldn't be the goal—it should be the proof of a job already well done.

Are we training mariners to be sailors, or are we training them to be administrators?


View Timm Stamer’s profile, open to work

Timm Stamer, Open to work 3rd+

Timm Stamer • 3rd



Captain


It’s not that the industry has lost faith in individual judgment but human factors like complacency, fatigue, and distraction are unavoidable, even among skilled mariners.


That’s exactly why frameworks like the International Safety Management Code exist: not to replace seamanship, but to support and stabilize it. Aviation is the clearest example—no one argues that pilots became less skilled because of checklists. They became safer because critical steps are no longer left to memory and routine alone..

Reaction button state: no reaction

View Dan Cleveland’s profile

Dan Cleveland 3rd+

Marine Engineer

I would say the larger problem is how All aspects of being a mariner and operating a ship have grown more complicated simultaneously. Ship machinery and power plants have grown more complex, digitized, and heavily monitored. Bridges are much more complicated. We have on board coms and IT systems that didn’t exist before. Training and credentialing has become more complex. Regulation and reporting requirements all continue to grow. The one thing not expanding is the number of hours in a day, and crew sizes (and office teams) continue to shrink. As the task list for the on board team gets longer, there’s less and less time for them to give to any one task, so the work quality goes down. Shipowners need to also include an answer to the question “How do we streamline the work load as a whole” when implementing anything new, or decide what they can do without.

Reaction button state: no reaction

3 reactions

View Stuart Speirs’ profile
Slightly disagree with this post. Yes it's true that a mountain of approving paperwork has arrived but the paperwork should only be there to verify a task has been completed to a performance standard.
And thats where it sits. Beyond is the bigger picture where highly trained, skilled and experienced seafarers continue or at least should be continuing to maintain the highly skilled practice of seamanship in all it's forms insisted upon by the Master of the vessel. You define paperwork as the primary tool but thats not the case, the seafaerer is still and always should be the primary asset in the successful execution of the venture.
View Manolis K.’s profile

1.. Historically maritime legislation was implemented after an accident. If competence was enough, the accidents would never happen.
2. Certificates of competence are given easier due to demand for workforce. Capitalism leads to maximizing the efficiency between cost and production, and crew with additional skills than the minimum ultimately cost more.
3. There is a fine line between Nepotism and high standards. The mentality of seamen competence is a prime example of this. Old seamen had more hardship, but due to Nepotism, officers were considered more knowledgeable than they actually were.
4. The means for paperwork to be complementary to seaman's life and supportive already exists. But anthropocentric design costs money to be implemented. Compliance can be achieved by lesser cost by companies leading to beauracratic procedures and what it seams as cobra effect. But as technology and society progress, new designs have lesser cost and are more effecient.

View Ciaran Jefferies’ profile, open to work

Ciaran Jefferies, Open to work 3rd+

Senior Technical Services Engineer at BP Castrol GME


.

As a trained Marine Engineer, I am aghast at times when I visit vessels or Offshore assets. I work for Castrol and we market class leading lubricants. It pains me to see the way in which they are stored on board. Simple husbandry appears to have disappeared.

Reaction button state: no reaction

John Keating 3rd+

Rigmover/Towmaster

Agree. Common sense left the shipping industry years ago. Tick box paperwork has nothing to do with improving the actual job, it’s all about covering your ar.e

Reaction button state: no reaction

View Daniel Menéndez Fernández MNI’s profile

Daniel Menéndez Fernández MNI Verified Profile 3rd+

Deck Officer Apprentice bij Boskalis | TDPO | The Nautical Institute MNI


Industry is training not towards seamanship but towards compliance. That's the origin of problems :)

10 Απριλίου, 2026

Australia Bans Bulk Carrier After 7 Months of Unpaid Crew Wages

                              


The Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA) has banned the BBG Wuzhou, pictured here, from entering Australian ports or waters for six months following a port state control inspection in Newcastle. Photo courtesy AMSA


Mike Schuler
April 9, 2026

Australia’s maritime regulator has issued a stark warning to shipowners after banning a Liberia-flagged bulk carrier for six months over serious breaches of seafarer welfare standards.

The Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA) announced it has prohibited the vessel BBG Wuzhou from entering Australian ports or waters until October 4, 2026, following a port state control inspection in Newcastle that uncovered widespread violations of the Maritime Labour Convention (MLC).

According to AMSA, inspectors identified multiple deficiencies during the boarding, including the underpayment of wages, inadequate food provisions, and a failure to provide free drinking water to crew members—conditions that led authorities to detain the vessel as unseaworthy and substandard.

The most serious finding: crew members had gone unpaid for nearly seven months, with outstanding wages totaling AUD $68,994.15.

“Seafarers play a critical role in keeping Australia moving, and they deserve to be paid lawfully and fairly,” said AMSA Acting Executive Director of Operations Greg Witherall. “Underpaying seafarers is exploitation—plain and simple.”

AMSA said the enforcement action underscores Australia’s “zero tolerance” approach to breaches of the MLC, which mandates minimum standards for working and living conditions at sea, including timely wage payments, safe accommodation, adequate rest, and access to basic necessities.

Failure to comply with these obligations can carry steep consequences. Vessel bans—such as the one imposed on BBG Wuzhou—can cost operators millions in lost revenue and disrupted trade, particularly in a market where port access is critical to maintaining charter commitments.

“Employers who engage in this behaviour should be in no doubt,” Witherall added. “If you are caught, you will be held to account.”

The case adds to a growing list of enforcement actions by AMSA targeting substandard shipping and labor abuses, as regulators globally face increasing pressure to uphold seafarer rights amid tightening sanctions regimes and heightened scrutiny of vessel operations.

For shipowners and managers, the message is clear: compliance with the Maritime Labour Convention is not optional—and the cost of falling short is rising fast.

gcaptain.com